Ivory Tower
A movie
The local Redbox video dispenser at a Seven-Eleven offered a
surprising movie titled “Ivory Tower,” a documentary (mis-labeled “drama”). The
author watched it from beginning to end. It was deja-vu for him and reminded
him of his forecasts of 40 years ago.
Ivory Tower – the movie
It’s a strange day when you find a movie outside your Seven-Eleven in the
Redbox video dispenser. It’s like putting a dollar in a Coke machine and
getting a potion that released memories for me. The movie is, “Ivory Tower,” and
it is all about higher education in the USA.
Watching the DVD I saw a parade of experts talking about the problems of
costly colleges, and how deep in debt people are going by using student loans
to pay high costs of college. Occasionally they questioned the value of the
college experience—was it worth the money it cost? Was it worth going into a
debt you would never be able to pay off?
All the while, I sit miles from the university where I taught for 19 years—the
University of Washington—the campus where I forecast what I saw the are the
problems the experts today were describing in the film.
By “experts” I am referring to the usual host who are worried—college presidents,
students, parents, and the most recent innovators in transmitting knowledge—computer
programmers and artificial intelligence experts. In the film they all said what
I said forty years ago: “We need to teach our students technology.”
It’s a funny feeling to be watching the president of Harvard and Stanford
saying, “We need to teach our students technology.” I think to myself, “Duh.” Those
are my words from 1970, and that was the talk I walked from 1970 and, fifteen
years later, walked me right off the campus forever.
Today
I suppose that, today, I am still making forecasts based on what I can see
right around me. An etching press sits on my workbench, almost ready for its
beauty shot (a pair of photos I make of every press I send out to the owners). Alongside
it, to “toy” wooden etching presses, too, also going to the owner in
California. My domain-of-expertise is printmaking. It’s what I taught in the
60s, 70s, and 80s at the UW. I can see that production and service are what
count, and if you can’t produce and you can’t serve, you’re dead.
What I taught in my 19 years at the UW was that printmaking is the ancestor
of technologies as we know them—including the Internet and going back through
history. Like rewinding history through computer graphics, TV, photography,
printing and ending up hand prints on cave walls. I taught it all, and it all
came down to production and service.
What was missing in college then was the vision to see what students would
be facing after a college education in the arts. The art faculty preferred to
keep technology on the back burner or non-existent. Some of my students went
along with my forecast and they sampled the media arts; I think it was of some
benefit as I see where those students are today because they produced and they
served.
In the 1970s I said, “We need to prepare student with technology experience
alongside the old-world arts, such as painting and the rest of it. Printmaking
was a good launching pad, since it is the ancestor of technology.”
As I watched the movie, “Ivory Tower,” it was deja-vu for me to see a few
professors and administrators mouthing the same words I said in 1970. It was
disturbing to see, also, that when these experts got around to including
technology in the curriculum, they concluded that it meant teaching coding as
computer science; but they were teaching people to code—as if coding were to
somehow keep them out of debt. It’s comparable to a religion—a few hackers made
it big and changed the way we live by coding, so everyone should learn to code.
Coding is an activity that gives you the feeling that you are thinking on
your feet when actually you’re sitting on your butt.
Occasionally in the film there was mention of the disasters of the
financing scandals of a few years ago, but no mention of what made the
disasters happen, namely, computer coding in the hands of people who didn’t
want to get their hands dirty.
Where, in my days in college, technology was not included in the curricula
of the arts and sciences, today it seems like the only thing; and never
mind ethics and humanities and, no mention of Earth’s human life
sustainability.
We seem to be living in a time when getting into an institution of higher
learning is something like going to heaven without actually dying, but merely believing
in a golden stairway. More often you end up with golden handcuffs.
If there are thirty years left to me (then I will be 102 years old) I hope
I will see that my present pathway is still the right one, and I will take care
that those presses for that woman in California get to her next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment